American white pelican at Padre Island National Seashore |
Many publishers open mail by hand and seal up the rejects in self-addressed stamped envelopes, then mail them back. Others heave the unwanted contents. All of this is time consuming, so why not have a computer weed out the inappropriate submissions?
great blue heron |
1. In my redesigned publishing house, a submitter would go online to a publisher's website and complete a pre-submission form. Completion of this form assigns a name and number to the submission.
When the ruddy turnstone spreads its wings, it's stunning. |
3. Each publisher would have the capability of creating and modifying a list of things they don't want to read because they are inappropriate for their house:
a) don't publish that genre
b) don't need books on a particular subject because they've got a contract on one
c) don't publish books for a certain age
d) don't publish that type of book (board book, early readers....)
The list could also include subjects they are seeking.
yellow warbler |
5. In lieu of postage, if publishers allowed emailed submissions, they could charge a nominal fee. The fee could be waived for writers that had a track record of producing submissions that were worth considering.
* A computer is capable of more sophisticated searches, weeding through manuscripts. For example, if a pre-submission form and first page were allowed, it could identify words that are too long for that age level....
I'm winding down on 3 things I've been working on, so I'm ready to dive into my waiting stack of projects.
cormorant |
No comments:
Post a Comment